affiliate_linkBuy Microsoft Office Ultimate 2007!

Downtown Progress

Exciting things are shaping up Downtown. As you should already know, the city has been sitting on a plan for what is currently known as Tidewater Park (although technically it is Tidewater Gardens). The plan renames the area as Saint Paul’s Quadrant (SPQ) and calls for the demolition of the public housing and the construction of a mixed-use, mixed-income development. The public housing would be replaced one-for-one with subsidized apartments. This would allow the property to be put back on the tax roles and it would help the residents that currently live in the projects to become more productive members of society. The second major plan, which was recently released, is that of the Multi-Modal Transportation Center. The new MMTC will connect light rail, city buses, the Elizabeth River Ferry, and high speed rail in one location. Additionally, it would bring development to the largely vacant area around Harbor Park. While these plans are good steps forward for Downtown by themselves, there are some smaller details included that could mean even larger steps forward.

For example, think about how you would go to Harbor Park. Water St., Park Ave., and Union St./E. Main St. are the main entry points. Now think about the surrounding area. Both Tidewater Drive and E. City Hall Ave. both point directly at the Park but the no longer connect, thanks to the Interstate. Also, there is a rarely used exit ramp from I-264 that exits onto Claiborne Ave. that has the potential to assist in getting people to the Park without further clogging E. Brambleton Ave. Unfortunately, Claiborne Ave. has to go through residential-sized roads only to have to merge back into Park Ave. The MMTC plan would fix these issues. Tidewater Drive and E. City Hall Ave. would connect directly to Park Ave. There would also be a new road built to connect Claiborne to additional parking on that side of the railroad tracks.

On the  SPQ side, there are also a number of new connections. The roadways that go through the public housing were designed to not connect. This may be good for keeping poor people from getting out (which doesn’t actually help anybody) but it is bad for a pedestrian-friendly, mixed use development. The SPQ plan would fix this. It would restore a grid system of roads and reconnect the SPQ area to Brambleton Ave. and to Tidewater Drive.

These projects are big news for Norfolk. Both will feed off of each other and off of Downtown. These two projects will nearly double the size of Downtown. Now we just need to get them built. The MMTC has a good chance of getting started if Norfolk gets award the federal grant they applied for.  The SPQ, however, appears to still be in limbo. When the project was released, the Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority decided they wanted to slow things down. Despite their successes in Broad Creek, they seem to still think that they can better serve their clients by containing them in poverty rather than allowing them to mingle with the middle class.

Regardless, since most people don’t read the studies and plans that the city releases, I wanted to make it easy. I have created a map below that shows the major points of both the SPQ and the MMTC combined.  Let me know what you think. Click on something and it should tell you what it is.

If you want to read the actual plans from the City, you can view the MMTC plan here and the SPQ plan here.

Don’t Tear Down Waterside

To City of Norfolk: don’t tear down Waterside.  Waterside has problems, yes, but it is not irreparable. Waterside started as a public/private partnership. It was successful. I think that with the right leadership and a new public/private partnership, Waterside can be made anew. It should be a place that people, particularly families, can go in the evenings and weekends and have good, clean fun. It should have a couple of good, independent restaurants that are open to the waterfront. It should have a coffee shop/café where downtown workers can take a relaxing lunch break on the water. Above all else, remember that this is WATERside. You should be able to have an open view of the water from almost anywhere in the building.

Previous Waterside:

Forget $5 Million, Try $1.5 Billion

The other day I wondered how VDOT could have an extra $5 million dollars for an HRBT study. Today I am wondering how they have $1.5 billion to spare. If you hadn’t heard, an auditor recently determined that VDOT had around $1.45 billion just sitting around. The money can be used for new projects, although they haven’t stated any particular ones. My fear is that Northern VA will get the bulk of the money. That money would do well to help get the proposed tolls down at the Midtown Tunnel. Or it could help Chesapeake pay for their new Dominion Blvd, which is an important corridor into North Carolina. It could be set aside as the state’s first payment to fund a Third Crossing. Whatever the scenario, the money should be used in Hampton Roads to start to make up for the shaft that we have received for years.

VDOT has $5 million extra?

VDOT has $5 million to spend on yet another study? If they had spent half as much on roads as on studies, we might have a world class transportation network here in Hampton Roads. As a region, we need to focus on building a well-planned “third crossing.” Expanding the HRBT will absolutely reduce congestion on that route. The Third Crossing, however, will reduce congestion and add options for a variety of routes. It will allow direct highway access for all of the Port of Virginia’s Southside facilities. Why is this important? It is important because truck traffic will not have to use Hampton Blvd, the HRBT, or any other artery in Hampton Roads. These truck bound for the western part of the state and beyond will be able to be on their way without impacting our major roadways. In the current age of tight budgets and no money for expanding highways, we, as a region, need to make our dollars count. The current Third Crossing plan already is fairly well thought out. It includes a link from Norfolk (near NIT) to I664. It includes a parallel crossing next to I664′s MMBT. It also includes a widening of I664 and a connection to the Western freeway. When coupled with the proposed connector for the MLK Freeway in Portsmouth, The Third Crossing would allow Downtown Portsmouth to have a near direct connection to the Peninsula, possibly boosting Portsmouth’s overall economy. The Third Crossing plan also includes a plan to make it multi-modal, meaning that it could accommodate a light rail line to the Peninsula and/or a freight line out to the west. The light rail line could vastly enhance the economic appeal of Downtown Newport News, spurring investment. A freight line would enhance the appeal of all of Hampton Roads’ ports, meaning increased port traffic without increased road traffic.

View

Hampton Roads Third Crossing in a larger map

The biggest question here should not be which road to widen, but how to fund the Third Crossing.  The estimated cost of the Third Crossing is nearly $6 billion (adjusted for inflation since 1997). That is obviously not going to be funded by Hampton Roads alone. $6 billion is approximately the same as the all of the Seven Cities’ budgets combined. This is the part where we need to get creative. The only way to get this built is to explore a combination of funding streams. Here is my plan:

First, we need to identify all stakeholders and get contributions. For example, the military will benefit from a Third Crossing, so they should chip in around half a billion dollars. The ports will benefit enormously, so the VA Port Authority should chip in around a billion dollars. The state should definitely chip in close to a billion dollars. The federal government is going to have to supply most of the money, perhaps 2.5 or three billion. The rest is going to have to be made up for with tolls. Of course, a Public-Private partnership could be reached that would allow the state, federal, and port subsidies to be reduced (but not eliminated). A one- or two-cent region-wide sales tax could also help reduce the subsidy from the state.

I know everyone hates tolls and taxes. I do to. However, nothing is free. Like I said, the cost of this project is the total of the budgets for all of the Seven cities. If we rely solely on the state or federal government, it will never get built. As for the HRBT, why waste $2-3 billion to build something that we may not need if we build the Third Crossing

VA Requiring Light Rail for VB?

According to a VP article today, the Virginia Department of Transportation may require Virginia Beach to use the Norfolk Southern corridor for light rail in exchange for the $20 million dollar contribution for its purchase. This should not be new. That was the stated purpose when the state approved the grant to assist in the extension of the Norfolk light rail line. Its also a great way for our State officials, who apparently can be leaders, to do what is necessary for the progress of the City of Virginia Beach and for Virginia. They have done what Virginia Beach’s leaders have been unable to do. Besides, why are VB residents surprised that state money comes with strings? Nearly all the money that we as cities receive from state and federal sources have strings attached. I can only hope, though, that the state sticks to its requirement and doesn’t back off.