<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>757 Hampton Roads: A Greater Region. A Greater Life. &#187; James City County</title>
	<atom:link href="http://757hamptonroads.com/tag/james-city-county/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://757hamptonroads.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 11:00:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Fairfax Gets It, Why Can&#8217;t We?</title>
		<link>http://757hamptonroads.com/2009/12/09/fairfax-gets-it-why-cant-we/</link>
		<comments>http://757hamptonroads.com/2009/12/09/fairfax-gets-it-why-cant-we/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 17:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>757HR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Automotive Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bus Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hampton Roads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Light Rail Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mass Trasportation (Other)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rail Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regional Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regionalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smart Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Need for Regionalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urban Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chesapeake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commuter Train]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hampton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James City County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Light Rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mass Transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mass Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newport News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norfolk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suffolk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transit Vision Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Beach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Williamsburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[York County]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://757hamptonroads.com/?p=599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fairfax recently released a new 10-year plan aimed at making transit travel more attractive the vehicle travel. The plan would increase service and frequency, create new routes, and use innovative techniques such as tying traffic lights to bus schedules, so that they never wait at lights. They also plan on utilizing dedicated bus lanes and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="top" />Fairfax recently released a new 10-year plan aimed at making transit travel more attractive the vehicle travel. The plan would increase service and frequency, create new routes, and use innovative techniques such as tying traffic lights to bus schedules, so that they never wait at lights. They also plan on utilizing dedicated bus lanes and fixed-route-style fare collection on some bus routes to speed the buses through stops. These new routes, including their already planned BRT routes, would work in unison with METRORail to make transit commutes faster than traditional, usually single-occupant, private car transportation.</p>
<p>My only question is why can Hampton Roads not come up with something this comprehensive. We did work on a plan for the future of transit but it seems to be viewed more as a dream and less of an actual this-is-what-we-need-to-work-for plan. Think about it. You see city after city create plans and actually follow them. Our area can do that too. Virginia Beach has been working on the Southeastern Parkway for 23 years now because it falls into their now-outdated plans to make the Corporate Landing office park successful. Why can&#8217;t we work this hard to make transit plans come through? If you ask any city, they will tell you that they want it to work, but nobody seems to be actually pushing for it.</p>
<p>In my opinion, the reason for the lack of drive for this issue is the lack of regional cooperation. Fairfax&#8217;s plan will work and has support because it only deals with one locality, Fairfax County. It ties into existing routes that go into other municipalities, but the plan itself, only expands service inside county lines. Here, however, our plan encompasses Norfolk, Virginia Beach, Chesapeake, Portsmouth, Suffolk, Newport News, Hampton, Williamsburg, James City County, and York County. In fact part of our Transit Vision Plan extends service toward Moyock, NC. How in the world do our leaders think that they can make something this expansive work if they can&#8217;t make simpler regional systems work. It is hard enough to get two cities to work on a bus route together let alone a system including both light rail and commuter rail. We need a functional regional government. If our localities could combine services and resources, we could actually overcome the problems that we face now. Look around. we are facing budget cuts all the time and money can no longer be guaranteed by the state. We have to help ourselves. Nobody else is coming to our rescue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://757hamptonroads.com/2009/12/09/fairfax-gets-it-why-cant-we/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HRTA -Questioned Again?</title>
		<link>http://757hamptonroads.com/2008/02/27/hrta-questioned-again/</link>
		<comments>http://757hamptonroads.com/2008/02/27/hrta-questioned-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>757HR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Automotive Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regional Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regionalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Need for Regionalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HRTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James City County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation Authority]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://757hamptonroads.wordpress.com/2008/02/27/hrta-questioned-again/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today the Virginian Pilot reported that James City County was reversing their decision to support the Hampton Roads Transportation Authority. I understand their thought. None of the projects that will be produced by the HRTA will affect JCC (except maybe the I64 widening). Even though they will not be affected, they will still be required [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="top" />Today the Virginian Pilot reported that James City County was reversing their decision to support the Hampton Roads Transportation Authority.<br />
I understand their thought. None of the projects that will be produced by the HRTA will affect JCC (except maybe the I64 widening). Even though they will not be affected, they will still be required to pay all of the fees that the HRTA will be collecting. They don&#8217;t believe the philosophy of a regional economy.<br />
I think that we can fix this problem though. The HRTA was created to do only certain projects set by the legislature. They cannot change these projects. I think that they should be made to be the Hampton Roads branch of VDOT. They should be funded by the state in an amount equal to what VDOT would spend on average in our area. I think that they should be allowed to collect tolls and fees to further fund themselves. This plan would keep our money where it belongs. They should also be able to modify, add, or eliminate projects. This would allow for a local organization to hear local comments on what should happen, instead of a far, far away legislature deciding for us.<br />
As for their priorities, they should improve our interstates, build new tunnels, and focus on light rail. Our interstates have potholes the size of small cars in some places. This is not acceptable. Furthermore, we cannot neglect our tunnels any longer. The Midtown tunnel should be 2 lanes in each direction with a right side shoulder, and the HRBT, MMBT, and Downtown tunnels should be 3 lanes in each direction with a right side shoulder. All 4 of these should also be built with a multi-purpose center tube for light rail. The HRBT should be first, followed by the Midtown. After that, the next 2 should be worked consecutively with light rail. We could build a regional world-class light rail system for cheaper than the current projects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://757hamptonroads.com/2008/02/27/hrta-questioned-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

